<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposed legislation would limit future school bonds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pomeradonews.com/2012/09/20/proposed-legislation-would-limit-future-school-bonds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pomeradonews.com/2012/09/20/proposed-legislation-would-limit-future-school-bonds/</link>
	<description>Serving Poway, Rancho Bernardo and 4S Ranch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:11:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: usna1957</title>
		<link>http://www.pomeradonews.com/2012/09/20/proposed-legislation-would-limit-future-school-bonds/#comment-666890</link>
		<dc:creator>usna1957</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomeradonews.com/?p=28822#comment-666890</guid>
		<description>All of the reporting thus far indicates that the PUSD Board took every legal advantage, and then stretched it just a wee-bit more. They were warned, even by the State Attorney General but took her failure to prosecute them as a green light. 
 
That is a tendency of attorneys. They know where the legal line is and walk it like a tightrope, with the knowledge that if they slightly overstep they will get &quot;professional courtesy,&quot; while the rest of us avoid the line with so much room to spare that if we stumble a couple of steps and fall, even our hair does not cross the legal line. 
 
And that is a good reason never to elect an attorney to anything. As to businesspeople, running a Mom and Pop shop (and I have), is vastly different from running a multi-hundred-million dollar corporation. (Done that, too) 
 
Elected officials rely on staff, I might add a staff that does not work for the elected officials. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the reporting thus far indicates that the PUSD Board took every legal advantage, and then stretched it just a wee-bit more. They were warned, even by the State Attorney General but took her failure to prosecute them as a green light. </p>
<p>That is a tendency of attorneys. They know where the legal line is and walk it like a tightrope, with the knowledge that if they slightly overstep they will get &quot;professional courtesy,&quot; while the rest of us avoid the line with so much room to spare that if we stumble a couple of steps and fall, even our hair does not cross the legal line. </p>
<p>And that is a good reason never to elect an attorney to anything. As to businesspeople, running a Mom and Pop shop (and I have), is vastly different from running a multi-hundred-million dollar corporation. (Done that, too) </p>
<p>Elected officials rely on staff, I might add a staff that does not work for the elected officials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PowayThieves</title>
		<link>http://www.pomeradonews.com/2012/09/20/proposed-legislation-would-limit-future-school-bonds/#comment-666634</link>
		<dc:creator>PowayThieves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomeradonews.com/?p=28822#comment-666634</guid>
		<description>They can add can&#039;t they?  I&#039;m not a rocket scientist and even I can figure out that 9 to 1 and no call is just bad management.  And they all have some type of business or legal background.  Look at their resumes.  And the premiums - really?  An extra $200 million in payoff  by taxpayers because the Board was swindled in 2009 and 2010?  Is that the excuse they&#039;re to use?  That they&#039;re rubes or too dumb to have figured it out?  That&#039;s rich. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They can add can&#039;t they?  I&#039;m not a rocket scientist and even I can figure out that 9 to 1 and no call is just bad management.  And they all have some type of business or legal background.  Look at their resumes.  And the premiums &#8211; really?  An extra $200 million in payoff  by taxpayers because the Board was swindled in 2009 and 2010?  Is that the excuse they&#039;re to use?  That they&#039;re rubes or too dumb to have figured it out?  That&#039;s rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Hemphill</title>
		<link>http://www.pomeradonews.com/2012/09/20/proposed-legislation-would-limit-future-school-bonds/#comment-665835</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Hemphill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 03:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomeradonews.com/?p=28822#comment-665835</guid>
		<description>In the final analysis, the responsibility rests with the voters, who elect  good people with no business background, no financial experience, who have never run anything where the term &quot;Billion&quot; or even &quot;Million&quot; is ever mentioned.  
 
These are (generally) honorable people, over their heads and susceptible to the bladmishments of professional staff and slick bond salesmen. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the final analysis, the responsibility rests with the voters, who elect  good people with no business background, no financial experience, who have never run anything where the term &quot;Billion&quot; or even &quot;Million&quot; is ever mentioned.  </p>
<p>These are (generally) honorable people, over their heads and susceptible to the bladmishments of professional staff and slick bond salesmen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde</title>
		<link>http://www.pomeradonews.com/2012/09/20/proposed-legislation-would-limit-future-school-bonds/#comment-665271</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomeradonews.com/?p=28822#comment-665271</guid>
		<description>In 2008 PUSD urged voters to approve $179M in borrowing &quot;for the kids&quot;. With that approval PUSD borrowed $219M. THIRTY ONE MILLION more than the voters authorized. Cost to Poway taxpayers? ONE BILLION, TWO HUNDRED MILLION!   
 
And it involves the 2009 Series A bond as well.  Tell me how Mangum didn&#039;t know now.  What the PUSD Board did was criminal.   
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/education/article_2dfa8c46-05cb-11e2-b3d5-001a4bcf887a.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/education/article_...&lt;/a&gt; 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2008 PUSD urged voters to approve $179M in borrowing &quot;for the kids&quot;. With that approval PUSD borrowed $219M. THIRTY ONE MILLION more than the voters authorized. Cost to Poway taxpayers? ONE BILLION, TWO HUNDRED MILLION!   </p>
<p>And it involves the 2009 Series A bond as well.  Tell me how Mangum didn&#039;t know now.  What the PUSD Board did was criminal.<br />
  <a href="http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/education/article_2dfa8c46-05cb-11e2-b3d5-001a4bcf887a.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/education/article_.." rel="nofollow">http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/education/article_..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.pomeradonews.com/2012/09/20/proposed-legislation-would-limit-future-school-bonds/#comment-661632</link>
		<dc:creator>John Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pomeradonews.com/?p=28822#comment-661632</guid>
		<description>We should bring back the 2/3 majority requirement for bond issues.  If this existed the Poway bond never would have occurred. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should bring back the 2/3 majority requirement for bond issues.  If this existed the Poway bond never would have occurred.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
