City Council forum works around no-bond ruling
By Steve Dreyer
Any opportunity for Thursday night’s Poway City Council candidate forum to become controversial was snuffed out early by a declaration from the event moderator that comments regarding Poway Unified School District bonds would be prohibited.

Poway City Council candidates, from left, Gary Vineyard, Steve Vaus, Jim Cunningham and Jeff Mangum. Photo by Steve Dreyer
“It’s not a city issue,” said the Beryl Flom of the San Diego chapter of the League of Women Voters, which provided several members to run the Poway Democratic Club-sponsored forum.
Her announcement generated a few grumbles from the estimated 120 people in the Poway Senior Center auditorium.
Mangum stepped down from the school board in 2010 after serving 14 years. He insists that while he voted in late-2007 to put the controversial bond issue on the February 2008 ballot as Proposition C, he was not on the board in May 2011 when the board voted to proceed with the issuing of the bonds. The $105 million in “Series B” capital appreciation bonds will cost non-Mello-Roos district taxpayers $1 billion by the time they are paid off in 40 years.
Mangum’s role, or lack of it, in the school bonds has surfaced as a major issue in the Nov. 6 council campaign.
Asked Friday morning to comment on the moderator’s no-bond-talk stance, Mangum emailed: The LWV decision was not mine, and I came to the forum prepared to answer questions about the PUSD bonds. As a practical matter, though, the complexity of the issue would make a meaningful 60-second response impossible.”
With the bonds relegated to elephant-in-the-room status, Mangum joined the three other candidates: Councilman Jim Cunningham, Steve Vaus and Gary Vineyard, in praising the dedication of city workers and calling for the synchronization of Poway Road traffic lights. All four said they opposed both extending water lines easterly to Highway 67 and adjusting zoning codes to allow multi-family buildings in north Poway.
Asked what they would like to change about Poway, three of the four said they pretty much liked the city the way it was, while Vaus called for more attention to be paid to the issue of teen substance abuse.
Cunningham, a 20-year resident and labor law attorney, is seeking his second four-year term on the council. He said that it has been a productive four years, with the council dealing with issues ranging from water rates and related conservative successes to the city maintaining strong fiscal reserves while adjusting to life after the loss of $20 million in redevelopment funding. He noted with pride the opening of the Veterans Park and addition of new playing fields at two city parks and said once-troubled skate park is enjoying record usage following the installation of innovative security measures.
“I’ve had the time of my life these past four years,” Cunningham told the audience.
Mangum, a 24-year-resident and attorney, said that while the city has much to be proud about, leaders “cannot rest on their laurels.” He cited his service on a school district-city liaison committee while on the PUSD board and his current term on the city’s Budget Review Committee. He spoke with emotion about the Poway community coming to the aid of himself and his family after they lost their home in the 2007 Witch Creek Fire.
“We need to preserve and maintain the Poway attitude,” Mangum said.
Vaus is a 19-year resident who owns a marketing and creative services company and is a professional singer. He is chairman of the city’s Budget Review Committee and is executive director of the Poway Community Leadership Institute. He headed up the successful 2010 recall against Councilwoman Betty Rexford and placed second, behind John Mullin, in the race to replace her.
Vaus described what he called the “storm clouds” of deficit budget spending and teen substance abuse hanging over the city, but noted that city residents have a track record of taking on and overcoming challenges. He said he’d like to see more citizen involvement in the city’s spending decisions, more biotech-type uses in the business park and the opening of more revenue streams from the Poway Center for the Performing Arts.
Vineyard is a 28-year city resident and small-business owner. He is making his third try to be elected to the council. He said he wants to represent both the interests of small-business owners and residents of south Poway, where he lives.
“The council has lost sight of the fact that they’re working for the people,” Vineyard said.
Adding a light moment to the evening Vineyard called himself “the green candidate” because he often rides a Segway around town.
Councilwoman Merrilee Boyack is not running for re-election on Nov. 6. The two candidates receiving the most votes will be elected to office.
Democratic Club President Mickey Foster was the evening’s master of ceremonies. The forum was recorded and will be available for viewing in a few days at www.powaydemocraticclub.org.
Related posts:
- Four are early entrants to Poway City Council election
- Poway City Council candidate forum is Thursday night
- Vineyard turns in City Council candidacy papers
- Vaus first to file for Poway City Council
- Poway council candidates certified to run
Short URL: http://www.pomeradonews.com/?p=29051

Mangum continues to deny his involvement in the bond fiasco. Well there's no surprise in that statement.
It is a documented fact that when he voted to authorize the $105m bond in OCTOBER 2010 the details were in the authorization. He knew. He chose not to raise a red flag. The 2009 Series A was nearly as bad with a 7 to 1 payback and $9 million in premiums.
Mangum is not trusted. He is busted.
"“It’s not a city issue,” said the Beryl Flom of the San Diego chapter of the League of Women Voters."
It absolutely is city issue. Having a candidate explain their voting record from a former elected position is absolutely relevant and should have been discussed. Instead once again Mangum dodged the issue and was coy.
I have to wonder why the League made that decision. The woman said that she knew nothing about Poway and then made that announcement. The Democratic committee guy said it was the League’s decision and he was really upset about it. So who got to the League to tell them about the issue and to say it shouldn’t be included?? Rather curious . . . Somebody pulled a fast one.
But don’t worry, I’m sure it wasn’t Mangum or any of his supporters. He has been tested and trusted, after all . . .
There's a "Friends of the Library" debate in a week, will the bonds still not be "a city issue" then and ignored? The fact that property taxes will go up throughout most of Poway because of the bonds really DOES make this a city issue. Of course I'd expect three of the four candidates to say they weren't ever involved and would never have voted to issue them this way, the fourth, well, read his handout.
Last night the League of Women Voters failed the community by not allowing any questions regarding the PUSD Bond fiasco to be asked of the Council candidates. What a disappointment for the taxpayers not to question Jeff Magnum about his unethical conduct on the PUSD and why he now thinks he is qualified to bring the same questionable expertise to the Council. The attendees were also interested in asking the other 3 candidates their opinions of the financial burden on Poway homeowners. It did not happen. Thanks a billion Beryl! Let us insist the next forum on Oct 8 is not censored.
It's our money, tax payers.